Effectiveness of simulation-based training
https://doi.org/10.21045/2782-1676-2025-5-1-50-55
Abstract
Introduction. Simulation training is a basic component of both medical school and postgraduate education, which requires modern education and healthcare systems to evaluate its effectiveness. The purpose of the study: evaluating the effectiveness of the simulation training allowed them to achieve long-term success and increase their prospects. Materials and methods. Search and analysis of world literature data on simulation training and criteria for the effectiveness of medical training was carried out. Results. Recently, there has been a rapid growth in simulation training programs, which requires the formation of criteria and indicators of their effectiveness. During our analysis of the available data, the following criteria for the effectiveness of the training were identified: frequency of attendance, compliance of the course program with its goals and objectives, simulation equipment, comfort level of participants and team work. Conclusion. Simulation training is a bridge between theoretical, fundamental knowledge and real clinical experience. The effectiveness of simulation training programs determines their rapid growth, which, in the face of an increasing number of proposals, obliges us to determine specific criteria and indicators of their effectiveness.
About the Authors
K. A. Gorina
National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology named after
Academician V. I. Kulakov
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Kseniya A. Gorina – PhD in Medical sciences, associated professor of the Department of Simulation Technologies; researcher of the Institute of Obstetrics
Moscow
E. M. Khamatkhanova
National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology named after Academician V. I. Kulakov
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Elizaveta M. Khamatkhanova – Grand PhD in Medical sciences, Head of the Department of Educational Simulation Technologies in Medicine
Moscow
M. D. Gapaeva
Moscow Regional Scientific Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology named after Academician V. I. Krasnopolsky
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Masara D. Gapaeva – junior researcher
Moscow
G. V. Khlestova
National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology named after Academician V. I. Kulakov
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Galina V. Khlestova – PhD in Medical sciences, Deputy Head of the Simulation and Training Center
Moscow
References
1. Gaba D. M. The future vision of simulation in health care. Qual Saf Health Care. 2004; 13 Suppl 1(Suppl 1): i2–10.
2. Cook D.A., Hatala R., Brydges R., Zendejas B., Szostek J. H., Wang A. T. et al. Technology-enhanced simulation for health professions education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2011; 306(9):978–88.
3. McGaghie W.C., Issenberg S. B., Cohen E. R., Barsuk J. H., Wayne D. B. Does simulation-based medical education with deliberate practice yield better results than traditional clinical education? A meta-analytic comparative review of the evidence. Acad Med. 2011; 86(6):706–11.
4. Dr. Amira Hamed Abdellatif. Patient Safety In Healthcare: Definition, Evolution & Impact. Nursing (Lond). 2022; 1(2):11–8.
5. Medical Simulation Market by Product & Service, Fidelity, and End User: Global Opportunity Analysis and Industry Forecast, 2021–2030.
6. Sandeva M.G., Tufkova S., Ketev K., Paskaleva D. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Simulation Training in Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pediatrics and Emergency Medicine. Folia Med (Plovdiv). 2019; 61(4):605–11.
7. Chopra V., Gesink B. J., de Jong J., Bovill J. G., Spierdijk J., Brand R. Does training on an anaesthesia simulator lead to improvement in performance? Br J Anaesth. 1994; 73(3):293–7.
8. Herrera-Aliaga E., Estrada L. D. Trends and Innovations of Simulation for Twenty First Century Medical Education. Front public Heal. 2022; 10:619769.
9. Nyssen A.-S., Larbuisson R., Janssens M., Pendeville P., Mayné A. A comparison of the training value of two types of anesthesia simulators: computer screen-based and mannequin-based simulators. Anesth Analg. 2002; 94(6):1560–5, table of contents.
10. Tassin M., Cordier A.-G., Laher G., Benachi A., Mandelbrot L. Amniocentesis trainer: development of a cheap and reproducible new training model. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2012; 41(7):679–83.
11. Cordier A.-G., Fuchs F., Tassin M., Saada J., Letourneau A., Brisset S. et al. Teaching invasive prenatal procedures: effectiveness of two simple simulators in training. Prenat Diagn. 2016; 36(10):905–10.
12. Mhyre J.M., Tsen L. C., Einav S., Kuklina E.V., Leffert L. R., Bateman B. T. Cardiac arrest during hospitalization for delivery in the United States, 1998–2011. Anesthesiology. 2014; 120(4):810–8.
13. Gardner R., Raemer D. B. Simulation in obstetrics and gynecology. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2008; 35(1):97-127, ix.
14. Committee opinion no. 590: preparing for clinical emergencies in obstetrics and gynecology. Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 123(3):722–5.
15. Alimena S., Freret T. S., King C., Lassey S. C., Economy K. E., Easter S. R. Simulation to improve trainee knowledge and comfort in managing maternal cardiac arrest. AJOG Glob reports. 2023; 3(2):100182.
16. Rosen M.A., Weaver S. J., Lazzara E. H., Salas E., Wu T., Silvestri S. et al. Tools for evaluating team performance in simulation-based training. J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2010; 3(4):353–9.
17. Malec J.F., Torsher L. C., Dunn W. F., Wiegmann D. A., Arnold J. J., Brown D. A. et al. The mayo high performance teamwork scale: reliability and validity for evaluating key crew resource management skills. Simul Healthc. 2007; 2(1):4–10.
18. Wright M.C., Phillips-Bute B.G., Petrusa E. R., Griffin K. L., Hobbs G. W., Taekman J. M. Assessing teamwork in medical education and practice: relating behavioural teamwork ratings and clinical performance. Med Teach. 2009; 31(1):30–8.
19. Frankel A., Gardner R., Maynard L., Kelly A. Using the Communication and Teamwork Skills (CATS) Assessment to measure health care team performance. Jt Comm J Qual patient Saf. 2007; 33(9):549–58.
20. Clapper T. C. Beyond Knowles: What Those Conducting Simulation Need to Know About Adult Learning Theory. Clin Simul Nurs. 2010; 6(1): e7–14.
21. Schmutz J., Eppich W. J., Hoffmann F., Heimberg E., Manser T. Five Steps to Develop Checklists for Evaluating Clinical Performance. Acad Med. 2014; 89(7):996–1005.
22. Watts P.I., McDermott D.S., Alinier G., Charnetski M., Ludlow J., Horsley E. et al. Healthcare Simulation Standards of Best PracticeTM Simulation Design. Clin Simul Nurs. 2021; 58:14–21.
Review
For citations:
Gorina K.A., Khamatkhanova E.M., Gapaeva M.D., Khlestova G.V. Effectiveness of simulation-based training. Public Health. 2025;5(1):50-55. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21045/2782-1676-2025-5-1-50-55
Views:
119
Email this article 